Several uses as specified in the district regulations of this
chapter are deemed conditional uses. Said uses have been identified
as having potential impacts and concerns which are, firstly, beyond
those and greater than those of permitted uses, and, secondly, having
impacts which might vary considerably depending on the character of
the facility, structure, or business proposed, and may require special
conditions as recommended by the Planning Commission, and approved
by the governing body.
The Planning Commission shall make recommendations and findings
of fact based in the following general and specific criteria, wherein
the governing body shall review said finding and conditional use application
and shall issue a decision, which may contain reasonable conditions.
Said findings, conditions, and recommendations shall consider the
following.
A. The maximization of the public health, safety, morals, and welfare
through adequate buffering and building location recognizing the need
to adequately provide for a certain use or class of uses.
B. The safety and requirements of the clients, residents, or patrons
of a potential use through the design of internal pedestrian and vehicular
circulation, site ingress and egress, general manner of operation,
signage, lighting, and related improvements.
C. The site design of the proposed use shall promote the least intrusive
options in regards to signage, vehicular circulation, deliveries,
and hours of operation as possible while accommodating the basic requirements
of the use's regular business operations.
D. The overall costs versus the benefits in regards to public services,
tax revenues, and benefits to the Planning Area's residents as
related to reasonable site design or associated modifications provided
by the applicant.
The applicant shall demonstrate the following, the demonstration
of which shall be evaluated by the Planning Commission and the respective
governing body.
A. Planned equipment would exceed the structural capacity of existing
communications towers considering existing and planned use of those
communications towers, and existing communications towers cannot be
reinforced to accommodate planned or equivalent equipment at a reasonable
cost;
B. Planned equipment will cause radio frequency (RF) interference with
other existing or planned equipment for that communications tower,
and the interference cannot be prevented at a reasonable cost;
C. Existing or approved communications towers do not have the space
on which planned equipment can be placed so it can function effectively
and at least in parity with other similar equipment in place or planned;
or
D. Other reasons make it impractical to place the equipment planned
by the applicant on existing and approved communications towers.
E. The applicant shall also include a plan to indicate feasibility of
locating additional communications antennas on the proposed communications
tower.
F. Where a communications tower is proposed, the applicant shall similarly
demonstrate the exhaustion or ineffectiveness of other options as
well as the need for the tower proposed.
G. No tower permitted shall exceed 199 feet in height.
H. Towers shall be set back one foot for every 1 1/2 feet of the
height of the tower or within the district setbacks which would otherwise
apply to other principal structures, whichever is greater.
I. A solid fencing surrounded by low-level landscaping shall screen
all other associated structures or equipment. Said structures shall
comply with all standards applying to principal structures within
the district in which said structures are placed.
J. No tower shall be located closer than one mile to any other existing
tower. In cases of telecommunications, the applicant shall demonstrate
that a significant gap exists in the nationwide cellular network,
thus necessitating the erection of an additional tower.