In addition to an administrative fee, which
the Board of Health has traditionally imposed, a new second type of
fee, referred to herein as the "project review fee," is now possible.
This fee is to be deposited into a special account as enabled by MGL
C. 44, § 53G, referred to herein as the "593 Account." This
fee* shall be imposed on those applications which, as designated by
the Board of Health, require the services of outside consultants for
the review process due to the size, scale or complexity of a proposed
project, because of a project's potential impacts, or because the
Town lacks the necessary expertise to perform the review work related
to the permit or approval. In hiring outside consultants, the Board
may engage engineers, planners, designers or other appropriate professionals
who can assist the Board in analyzing a project to ensure compliance
with all relevant laws, ordinances, bylaws and regulations. Such assistance
may include, but not be limited to, analyzing an application, monitoring
or inspecting a project or site for compliance with the Board's decisions
or regulations, or inspecting a project during construction or implementation.
* NOTE: The term "fee" has a different connotation
when used in the phrase "administrative fee" than when used in the
phrase "project review fee." Administrative fees are exact payments
assessed to an applicant and are therefore a precise, known project
cost. Project review fees are really deposits into a special "escrow"
account from which actual review costs will be paid. Because any excess
left in the account will be returned to the applicant, it is not known
at the time the project review fee is imposed what the actual eventual
project cost will be.
|
A. Monies shall be collected from the applicant and deposited
into the 593 Account upon submission of the application. The applicant
must also furnish the Town Treasurer with either a federal identification
number or a social security number for earned interest reporting to
the Internal Revenue Service.
B. Outside consultants retained by the Board of Health
to assist in the review of an application shall be paid from this
account.
C. The Board of Health shall determine the amount of initial deposit to be made, as put forth in the accompanying schedule, and the amount of any additional funds required during the process, should the applicant's 593 Account approach depletion. Such determinations shall be consistent with the requirements of §
278-12B.
D. Any excess amount attributable to a particular project,
including accrued interest, will be repaid to the applicant, or the
applicant's successor in interest, at the conclusion of the review
process. For the purpose of this regulation, any person or entity
claiming to be an applicant's successor in interest shall provide
the Board with documentation establishing such succession in interest.
E. Should it become apparent to the Board of Health,
and the applicant is in agreement, that an application requires the
services of outside consultants for proper review, the Board may require
the imposition of this second type of fee, even if it is not normally
part of the review process for that type of application, and providing
that said imposition is in compliance with the state enabling legislation.
When more than one type of application is being
sought at the same time (for the same project), only the highest of
the applicable project review fees shall be collected for deposit
into the 593 Account, and not the sum of those fees.
A. Initial deposits. The following project review fees for the indicated
application types are to be submitted with their initial applications:
[Amended 6-1-2015]
|
Project Review Fees*
|
Initial Deposit
|
Additional Deposit
|
---|
|
Community or industrial sewage disposal system
|
$1,000
|
Plus engineer's estimate, if peer review required*
|
|
Hazardous material remediation
|
$1,000
|
Plus engineer's estimate, if peer review required*
|
|
Subdivision project remediation
|
$1,000
|
Plus engineer's estimate, if peer review required*
|
B. Exemptions from initial deposits. Applications involving a single lot do not require the submission of a project review fee with the initial application. The Board of Health shall consider at the first review session, or at any subsequent review session, whether such a fee is warranted and, if so, the amount of the fee. Such flexibility is necessary because the wide range of scope and scale to such applications makes it difficult to calculate an equitable project review fee without consideration of the project on a case-by-case basis. In addition to those application types listed here, any other type of application not specifically listed in Subsection
A above shall be subject to Article
III.
C. Subsequent deposits. If the cost for the consultant to review the
project exceeds the amount deposited into the revolving fund, the
applicant is responsible for reimbursing the Town for the additional
costs. The Board shall utilize the following procedure:
[Amended 6-1-2015]
(1) Request a written estimate from the consultant on the cost to review
the project, including the cost to attend meetings with the design
engineer and public hearing(s), if necessary.
(2) The Board shall vote to accept the estimate with a provision that
the cost to review the project shall not exceed the estimate without
written approval from the Committee.
(3) The Board shall inform the applicant of the cost estimate for project
review and of any additional costs that may be incurred.
D. Inspection phase of projects. After the granting of
any permit or approval which will culminate in construction requiring
inspections by Board of Health consultants, the Board may wish to
make an adjustment in the funds held in an applicant's 593 Account.
(1) The 593 Account may be adjusted by issuing a refund
to the applicant or by requiring a supplemental project review fee.
(2) Adjustments should be made after all bills for review
services have been accounted for.
E. The Board of Health has the right to require supplemental project review fees if the applicant's 593 Account approaches depletion during the inspection phase of the review process. Such findings of the Board, while subject to the provisions of §
278-12B, do not require a formal hearing or prior notice to interested parties.