WHEREAS, on June 23, 2005, the Supreme Court of the United States decided the case of Kelo v. City of New London in which a majority of the Court determined, among other things, that the "public purpose provision of the United States Constitution should be broadly interpreted to effectuate legislative judgments as to what particular needs justify the use of the power of eminent domain; and
WHEREAS, the result in Kelo was a plurality decision, reflecting the Court's deep division on the question presented, namely whether private residential real property may be the subject of eminent domain in order to satisfy a public purpose such as a planned development; and
WHEREAS, the result of the Kelo decision was that, where there existed a comprehensive plan of development that is deemed to satisfy the public purpose provision of the Constitution, even though the "motivation" for the plan might be economic development, municipalities could use the eminent domain power to achieve the desired end as long as all parties' legal rights were established in the process; and
WHEREAS, the Kelo majority opinion specifically emphasized that nothing in the decision should preclude a state from placing further restrictions on the takings power; and
WHEREAS, one of the issues faced by the Court was the appropriate line between public and private use; and
WHEREAS, under the settled law of the State of New Jersey, the limitless sovereign power of the State may be employed to take real property as may be required for public safety, necessity, convenience or welfare so long as just compensation is paid the owner, but it is for the legislative branch of government to determine what constitutes a public use as to limit that broad power, with the result that the power is to be used in a reasonable non-arbitrary manner, and not greater than necessary to effectuate the public use; and
WHEREAS, the Borough of Waldwick believes that one of the primary purposes of government is to protect the rights of owner-occupied residential real properties within the Borough against governmental takings that do not have as their goal, either (a) the transfer of private property to public ownership for the creation of, for example, a road, hospital or military base or (b) the transfer of private property to private owners for the specific purpose of making the same available for public use (e.g. railroad, public utility or stadium).