A.
It is the applicant's responsibility to note those requirements and
presumptions contained in these Regulations that are, per Home Rule
Authority of the Town, articulated in addition to those set forth
in 310 CMR 10.03(1) and 310 CMR 10.03(2).
B.
The applicant has the burden of proving by a preponderance of credible
evidence that the work proposed in the application will not have significant
adverse effects upon the interests protected by the Sherborn General
Wetlands Bylaw[1] and these Regulations, and the Commission accepts and approves such evidence, including but not limited to overcoming the presumptions set forth in Article V.
C.
Failure to provide this evidence to the Commission is sufficient
cause for the Commission to deny the proposed project or, at the Commission's
discretion, to continue the hearing to another date to enable the
applicant or others to present additional evidence.
