Any activity regulated by this chapter shall
only occur or be undertaken and be continued in conformance with the
requirements of this chapter.
This chapter regulates all matters and activities authorized by Article
VI of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code (hereinafter referred to as MPC).
The Zoning Hearing Board shall hear duly filed
requests for variances.
A. Standards. The Board may grant a variance only in
accord with the requirements of Section 910.2 of the MPC. The applicant shall have the burden of proof to show compliance
with such standards. As of January 2003, the MPC provided that all
of the following findings are made where relevant in a given case:
(1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions,
including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or
shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar
to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due
to such conditions and not the circumstances or conditions generally
created by the provisions of this chapter in the neighborhood or district
in which the property is located.
(2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions,
there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict
conformity with the provisions of this chapter and that the authorization
of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use
of the property.
(3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created
by the appellant.
(4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the
essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property
is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate
use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the
public welfare.
(5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the
minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least
modification possible of the regulation in issue.
B. Reapplication. The Zoning Officer shall refuse to
accept a proposed application that is not materially or significantly
different from an appeal on the same property that was denied by the
Board within the previous year.
C. Variance conditions. In granting any variance, the
Board may attach such reasonable conditions and safeguards as it may
deem necessary to implement the purposes of the MPC and this chapter
and to protect the public health, safety, and welfare.
Parties to proceedings authorized by this chapter
and the MPC may use the mediation option as authorized by and in accord
with Section 908.1 of said Code.
The time limitations for appeals shall be as
follows:
A. Zoning Hearing Board; county court. No person shall
be allowed to file any appeal with the Zoning Hearing Board later
than 30 days after the officially issued decision of the Zoning Officer,
or appeal to the County Court of Common Pleas later than 30 days after
the officially issued decision of the Council or the Zoning Hearing
Board, except as may be provided under Section 914.1 of the MPC.
B. Temporary permits. This thirty-day time limit for appeal shall not apply to the revocation of a permit issued by the Zoning Officer under §
215-105E.
C. Subdivision or land development approval. The failure
of an aggrieved person, other than the landowner, to appeal an adverse
decision directly related to a preliminary subdivision or land development
plan shall preclude an appeal from a final plan approval, except in
the case where the final submission substantially deviates from the
approved preliminary plan.
Appeals to court and other administrative proceedings shall be governed by Article X-A and Article
IX of the MPC, respectively.
See Section 619 of the MPC.
The minimum lot area requirements of this chapter
shall not apply to uses or structures owned by the Borough for uses
and structures that are intended for a legitimate governmental, recycling,
public recreation, stormwater control or public health and safety
purpose.
The Council may amend this chapter by complying with the requirements set forth in Article
VI of the MPC. A landowner who desires to challenge on substantive grounds the validity of an ordinance or map or any provision thereof which prohibits or restricts the use or development of land in which he has an interest may submit a curative amendment to the Council with a written request that his challenge and proposed amendment be heard and decided as provided in Section 609.1 and Section 916.1 of the MPC.