•
|
Any applicant (developer or redeveloper) shall first attempt to infiltrate the volume required in § 308-18A(2)(a).
|
•
|
If the § 308-18A(2)(a) requirement cannot be physically accomplished, then the applicant is required to attempt to infiltrate the volume required in § 308-18A(2)(b).
|
•
|
Finally, if the § 308-18A(2)(b) infiltration volume cannot be physically accomplished, the applicant must, at a minimum, infiltrate the volume required in § 308-18A(2)(c).
|
Rev = 1 (inch)* impervious area (square
feet) ÷ 12 (inches) = cubic feet (cf)
|
An asterisk (*) in equations denotes multiplication.
|
Rev = I * impervious area (square feet)
÷ 12 (inches) = cubic feet (cf)
|
An asterisk (*) in equations denotes multiplication.
|
Where:
|
I = The maximum equivalent infiltration amount (inches) that
the site can physically accept or 0.50 inch, whichever is greater.
|
Table 21.1
| |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Peak Rate Control Standards by Stormwater Management District
in the Darby-Cobbs Creek Watershed
| |||||
District
|
Proposed Condition Design Storm
|
Existing Condition Design Storm
| |||
A
|
2-year
|
1-year
| |||
5-year
|
5-year
| ||||
10-year
|
10-year
| ||||
25-year
|
25-year
| ||||
100-year
|
100-year
| ||||
B-1
|
2-year
|
1-year
| |||
10-year
|
5-year
| ||||
25-year
|
10-year
| ||||
50-year
|
25-year
| ||||
100-year
|
100-year
| ||||
B-2
|
2-year
|
1-year
| |||
5-year
|
2-year
| ||||
25-year
|
5-year
| ||||
50-year
|
10-year
| ||||
100-year
|
100-year
| ||||
C
|
Conditional Direct Discharge District.
|
Table 21.2 [Delaware River/Other]
| ||
---|---|---|
Peak Rate Control Standards in the Delaware River/Darby District
"C"/Ridley Creek Watersheds
| ||
Proposed Condition Design Storm
|
Reduce to
|
Existing Condition Design Storm
|
2-year
|
1-year
| |
5-year
|
5-year
| |
10-year
|
10-year
| |
25-year
|
25-year
| |
50-Year
|
50-year
| |
100-year
|
100-year
|
• For the Ridley Creek Watershed: The Delaware Direct table
should be used for all subareas listed as 100% release rate. However,
for subareas below 100%, the Municipal Engineer should decide as to
the correct requirement.
|
• For the Chester Creek Watershed: Watershed subareas with
a 100% should confirm that the peak rate control requirement is at
least as stringent as the Delaware Direct requirement.
|
Table 22.1
| ||
---|---|---|
Acceptable Computation Methodologies for SWM Site Plan
| ||
Method
|
Developed By
|
Applicability
|
TR-20 (or commercial computer package based on TR-20)
|
USDA NRCS
|
Applicable where use of full hydrology computer model is desirable
or necessary
|
TR-55 (or commercial computer package based on TR-55)
|
USDA NRCS
|
Applicable for land development plans where limitations described
in TR-55
|
HEC-1/HEC-HMS
|
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
|
Applicable where use of a full hydrologic computer model is
desirable or necessary
|
Rational Method (or commercial computer package based on Rational
Method)
|
Emil Kuichling (1889)
|
For sites up to five acres, or as approved by the Municipality
and/or Municipal Engineer
|
Other methods
|
Varies
|
Other computation methodologies approved by the Municipality
and/or Municipal Engineer
|