[Amended 12-21-2004 by L.L. No. 14-2004]
A. Review of plans.
(1) A preliminary conference may be held between the Review
Board and the applicant prior to the preparation and submission of
a formal submission. The intended purpose of such a conference is
to enable the applicant to inform the Review Board of his proposal
prior to the preparation of a detailed submission and to provide the
Review Board with an opportunity to review the basic design concept,
to advise the applicant as to potential problems and concerns and
to generally determine the information to be required on the formal
submission.
(2) The Review Board may waive any of the requirements
of this section where, due to character, size, location or special
circumstances, either the preliminary conference or any particular
information is not required in order for the Review Board to properly
perform its review.
(3) No building permit for any building or structure subject
to this article shall be issued unless it shall first have been approved
by a vote of at least a majority of the members of the Review Board.
(4) Final approved maps or plans, materials and specifications
may not be altered in any way without the express prior approval of
the Review Board. Any requested changes of the approved plans or maps
must be submitted for review at least seven days prior to the next
regularly scheduled meeting of the Review Board, and no construction
work involving such changes shall be commenced or continued until
approval of the Review Board is granted. The Superintendent of Buildings
shall, in cases of violation of this procedure, order all work to
be halted and, if necessary, revoke the building permit until such
time that amended plans or maps are approved by the Review Board.
This section may also be enforced by the Board of Trustees by means
of injunction. If the Village proceeds by injunction and is successful,
reasonable attorneys' fees, engineering fees and other expert witness
fees shall be paid by the defendant.
B. Standards for review.
(1) In considering an application, the Review Board shall
take into account the density of development, lot area coverage on
all habitable levels of the proposed construction, floor/area ratios,
skyplanes (i.e., front yard building height in relation to distance
from property line), natural features of the site and surroundings,
exterior design and appearances of existing structures and the character
of the neighborhood and its peculiar suitability for particular purposes,
with a view to preserving the values of property and encouraging the
most appropriate use of land. The Review Board may, in its discretion,
require that the application include a topographical survey.
[Amended 7-15-2008 by L.L. No. 4-2008]
(2) The Review Board may approve any application to it
upon finding that the building or structure for which the permit was
requested, if constructed, erected, reconstructed or altered in accordance
with the submitted plan, would be in harmony with the purpose of this
article, would not be visually offensive or inappropriate by reason
of poor quality of exterior design, monotonous similarity or striking
visual discord in relation to the sites or surroundings, would not
mar the appearance of the area, would not impair the use, enjoyment
and desirability and reduce the value of properties in the area, would
not be detrimental to the character of the neighborhood, would not
prevent the most appropriate utilization of the site or of adjacent
land and would not adversely affect the functioning, economic stability,
prosperity, health, safety and general welfare of the entire community.
(3) In approving any application, the Review Board may impose appropriate conditions and safeguards designed to prevent the harmful effects set forth in §
99-50B hereof.
(4) The Review Board may disapprove any application for a permit, provided that the Review Board has afforded the applicant an opportunity to confer upon suggestions for change of the plan or map and provided that the Review Board finds and states that the structure or building for which the permit was requested would, if erected, constructed, reconstructed or altered as indicated, provide one or more of the harmful effects set forth in §
99-50B hereof by reason of:
(a)
Monotonous similarity to any other structures
or buildings located or proposed to be located in the vicinity in
respect to one or more of the following features of exterior design
and appearance:
[1]
Substantially identical facade, disregarding
color.
[2]
Substantially identical size and arrangement
of either doors, windows, porticos, porches or garages or other opening
or breaks or extensions in the facade, including reverse arrangements.
[3]
Other substantially identical features, such
as but not limited to setbacks from street lines, heights, widths
and lengths of elements of building design and exterior materials
and treatments.
(b)
Striking dissimilarity, visual discord or inappropriateness
with respect to other structures or buildings located or proposed
to be located in the vicinity in respect to one or more of the following
features of exterior design and appearance:
[1]
Facade, disregarding color.
[2]
Size and arrangement of doors, windows, porticos,
porches or garages or other openings, breaks or extensions in the
facade.
[3]
Other significant design features, such as but
not limited to heights, widths, length or elements of design, exterior
materials and treatments, roof structures, exposed mechanical equipment,
service and storage areas, retaining walls, landscaping, signs, light
posts, parking areas, fences and service areas.
(c)
Visual offensiveness or other poor qualities
of exterior design, including but not limited to excessive divergences
of the height or levels of any part of the structure or building from
the grade of terrains, harmony or discord of color or incompatibility
of the proposed structure, building, refurbishing, reconstruction,
alteration or addition with the terrain on which it is to be located
and the failure of the exterior design to complement and enhance the
natural beauty of its site in regard to landscape, topography, surrounding
structures and the scenic character of roadways when visible from
said roadways.
C. Action on application. Within 90 days of the date
of determination of a completed application by the Review Board, the
Review Board shall approve, approve with modifications or disapprove
the application. The time period in which the Review Board must render
its decision and recommendation may be extended by the Review Board.
The failure of the Review Board or any other reviewing agency to make
a determination within any formal time period shall be deemed a disapproval
or recommendation of disapproval of the application.
D. Appeals. Except for those referred to in §
99-54F, any applicant aggrieved by a decision of the Review Board shall be entitled to appeal the decision to the Zoning Board of Appeals.
This article shall supersede the provisions
of § 4-412 and Article 7 of the Village Law of the State
of New York, as amended, to the extent that such provisions conflict
with or are contrary to the provisions of this article.
Applicant shall be required to pay the fees and deposits as set forth in the schedule of fees in §
99-62. The payment of any fee or deposit in connection with an application shall be a condition precedent to the acceptance of any application.